🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an cute little “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “endless energy” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.

Thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have been caught in a struggle between a defunct facility, public officials and animal rights activists.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned controversy over their future often ignores the nuances of the whales who, after living their entire lives in enclosed habitats, have been thoroughly researched by the people who see them each day.

After the Canadian government prevented the export of the belugas to China, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are housed stated it would consider to put them down unless the authorities covers the upkeep of their care. Canada’s fisheries minister has refused that request, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Experts say that beluga whales’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and social skills suggest they are deeply intelligent animals – something a former trainer discovered personally.

She spent a significant period as a beluga trainer, a role that involved building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the nuances and quirks in their dispositions. She developed a special affection for two female belugas with contrasting natures.

“Eve accepted me. The other required effort,” she said. “Both changed the way I perceive relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a context of increasing societal concern to their confinement.

During her three years at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, died. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility links to age-related causes, but which activists say points to the substandard environment in which they were maintained.

The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes effects of the closure. “Concrete is falling apart from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and navigate with fragments in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The park did not reply to a inquiry, but in the past asserted: “The whales … receive far superior veterinary services and 24/7 attention than any individual in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was terminated from the park in the spring following the death of a beluga, an sick beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the facility thought information of the death were shared to the press and she was let go soon after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and staff members in despair. She says the park’s warning to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any plans to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “immense manpower”, vehicles and machinery.

“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She supports calls for the whales to be removed immediately from the park, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In late September, the nation’s government official rejected a proposal to export the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the proposal would have meant a continued life in confinement and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister wrote. “As the public, we know that marine mammals belong in the ocean, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience authorize an transfer that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have suffered.”

But Burgess said the official’s statements reflect a wider misunderstanding of the circumstances of life for belugas born in captivity.

“The people needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers attempt to find a answer, ideas have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A suggested sanctuary in the province of eastern Canada, which has received official endorsement, has shown to be most controversial. The future site, which includes extensive space of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain positive that it could in time represent a permanent solution for some of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “only an experiment” in the whales’ well-being.

Some experts say the idea of a protected habitat represents a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a feasible plan in the coming months.

The project lead, leader of the sanctuary project, said the site will mimic the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive area. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|